Book Review: Hawksbill Station (variant title: The Anvil of Time), Robert Silverberg (1968)

5/5 (Masterpiece)

Robert Silverberg strikes gold with Hawksbill Station (1968), a dark, restrained, and powerful rumination.  I have found Silverberg’s novels, like those of one of my other sci-fi favorites John Brunner, hit or miss.  The worst of Silverberg’s novels I’ve read, for example The Time Hoppers (1967) and  Master of Life and Death (1957), are cringeworthy.  His best, Downward to the Earth (1970) and The World Inside (1971), rank among my all-time favorites.

Hawksbill Station‘s setting, Earth’s Cambrian era, Continue reading

Update: Recent Science Fiction Acquisitions N. VIII

My month of infrequent posts is over — I’ve returned to Austin after a month long sojourn across Colorado, New Mexico, France and Italy….  So, what do I do in my jet lagged state?  Head to the Half Price Books.  Not the best haul this time but a few potentially interesting reads.

1. Witch World (1963), Andre Norton

I’ve yet to read any of Andre Norton’s immense number of novels.  Not knowing exactly where to start I picked up what is generally considered among her best works — Witch World (1963).  It was nominated for the 1964 Hugo award for Best novel and often places in best Fantasy/Sci-fi lists.  And the cover is Continue reading

Book Review: Star Ways (variant title: The Peregrine), Poul Anderson (1956)

2.75/5 (Average)

Poul Anderson’s third novel contains a few glimmers of his later slick storytelling but lacks developed ideas and convincing characters.  This is not entirely Anderson’s fault, as he points out in the introduction to a later edition, because the original manuscript was heavily edited without his knowledge in order to achieve a specific page Continue reading

Book Review: To Live Again, Robert Silverberg (1969)

3/5 (Average)

To Live Again (1969) is a flawed work from a very fruitful period of Robert Silverberg’s career.  The ideas are original and well-conceived but a downright disgusting strain of misogyny and sexism permeates virtually every page.  Bluntly put, I cannot recall a single instance where a female character does anything without the shape, size, and clothed or unclothed state of her breasts Continue reading

Book Review: The Last Starship From Earth, John Boyd (1968)

2.5/5 (Bad)

John Boyd’s The Last Starship from Earth (1968) is a forgettable and predictable alternative history/science fiction novel incorrectly described by some reviewers as a lost classic.  The basic divergent point in history (which is only mentioned near the end) is the only redeeming feature of the work because the society he’s created becomes slightly more cohesive and realized.  However, Boyd’s reliance on time-travel Continue reading

Updates: Recent Science Fiction Acquisitions N. VII

Austin’s Half Price Books will be my downfall.  I’ve broken my promise not to buy any more science fiction books this summer…

1. The Big Jump (1955), Leigh Brackett (MY REVIEW)

I’ve yet to read a work by the famous female sci-fi writer and screenwriter (The Big Sleep, The Empire Strikes Back, Rio Bravo, El Dorado) Leigh Brackett.  I look forward to this “pulp” work with great Continue reading

Updates: Recent Science Fiction Acquisitions N. VI

I’ve held to my promise not to buy any more books this summer considering I have at least 40 unread sci-fi books looming over my shoulder.   However, other people are welcome to procure books FOR me! And they have — all of the following were gifts! Thank you!

1. The Last Starship from Earth (1968), John Boyd (MY REVIEW)

I’ve read multiple reviews which claim that John Boyd’s The Last Starship from Earth is a lost classic.  However, opinion are far from unanimous (for example, the sci-fi author Joanna Russ wrote a scathing review blaming the publishers for subjecting her and fellow readers to Continue reading

Book Review: Master of Life and Death, Robert Silverberg (1957)

0.25/5 (Terrible)

First, a few words to describe the tattered novel (I hurled it on the ground at one point) in front of me.

Politically dangerous: Master of Life and Death (1957) presents dictatorship (well, so-called “benevolent” dictatorship), propaganda, extreme distrust of the common person, fratricide, surveillance, torture, government control of the press, political assassination, euthanasia of children, among other equally dubious activities as occasionally necessary for the good of humanity.

I understand that Silverberg himself does not endorse these positions BUT he in NO WAY presents the actions of his main character as anything other than exemplarily and a necessary result of the tough position he finds himself Continue reading