Book Review: Ground Zero Man (variant title: The Peace Machine), Bob Shaw (1971)

3.5/5 (Good)

Bob Shaw’s Ground Zero Man (1971) is a well-told take on a common 50s/60s/70s sci-fi trope — the discovery of technology which could potentially end the omnipresent danger of all out nuclear war.  Although the premise is straightforward and simplistic, the main character (Lucas Hutchman) and his motivations are drawn in a convincing manner, the ending is somewhat surprising and dark, and the novel is on the whole characterized by solid prose.  At points Shaw does touch on some relevant philosophical points but sadly doesn’t pursue them with any concentrated vigor.  Also, the work is blighted by a strain of over-the-top melodrama.

If the remarkable cover (naked man bowing before gigantic tower with balancing squished spheroid ringed with raging red sun) peers at you from the shelves of a used book store do not hesitate to pick up a copy — but, don’t go out of your way to track it down unless you enjoy Shaw’s other works or salivate uncontrollably over nuclear war related sci-fi.

Brief Plot Summary (limited spoilers)

Lucas Hutchman is a brilliant mathematician stuck in a job way below his talent level developing effective ways of launching missiles carrying warheads.  Added to that, Hutchman cares deeply for his wife Valery who’s perpetually convinced that he’s cheating on her — frustrating him to no end.

Disillusioned with home life and the state of the world on the brink of nuclear disaster, Lucas develops the mathematics and the schematics for a “self-propagating neutron resonance machine” which would simultaneously detonate every nuclear bomb in the world.  The plot thickens (and Lucas’ desire to use his device) when guerilla groups acquire a nuclear device which they detonate over Damascus, Syria killing 500,000 people.

Shaw introduces his main philosophical theme at this point (as mentioned above, in very tentative/minimal fashion) — Hutchman appears to have deep empathy with humanity as a whole — however, his precise view depends on his wildly swinging mental state.  On the other hand Valery, his wife, dismisses the Damascus event because it seems so distant from the problems at hand (especially, the consuming belief that her husband is cheating on her).  Valery’s moral judgments are bound up in the immediate confines of her world.

Lucas devotes more and more of his time to building the device causing deepening strife with his wife — as well as various other potentially incriminating incidents with women he meets.  Lucas’ own decision whether to use the device or not is linked to his personal frame of mind regarding his family life.

The first half of the work describes Lucas’ strife at home and the building of the machine.  The second half of the work describes him on the run from the authorities after he alerts the world governments about the device.  And then there’s a plot twist… of sorts…

Final Thoughts 

The plot is a by-the-numbers sort of affair.  A series of highly improbably (and occasionally silly) coincidences and happenstances propel it forward.  However, Shaw adeptly weaves together Lucas’ home life into the more general “building the machine” narrative.  I found Lucas’ character by far the most admirable quality of the work — although at heart a good man, he allows his emotional frame of mind to influence his desire to use the machine on humanity as a whole.

The interplay between microcosm (the family and its immediate problems) vs. macrocosm (the Damascus incident and the possibility of destroying all nuclear weapons) is at the heart of the novel.

A solid single sitting sort of read…

More Book Reviews

6 Replies to “Book Review: Ground Zero Man (variant title: The Peace Machine), Bob Shaw (1971)”

  1. “A solid single sitting sort of read…”

    I think that sums up what I’ve read by Shaw quite well, actually! Also… that cover is awesome.

    Might read it soon too. I wasn’t completely convinced by the motivations of characters in the other novels. This sounds a bit better.

    Having said that, I take the point that Shaw’s characters > Asimov’s characters (original post to which I referred before). I suppose that I was forgetting literary style characterisation was unlikely and the point was that it was just better than weak Golden Age stuff! Relative and that.

  2. Ground Zero Man has the unfortunate tendency to verge on melodrama… But yes, I did think the characterization of Lucas Hutchman was spot on.

    I have no interest in Asimov — I’ve read 5 or so books and gave up on him. Stilted, dry, blehh… I’m being mean and dismissive of one of the greats I know.

  3. Finished this book a few days and just got around to reviewing it on Amazon. I mention pretty much the same things you did and I also gave it 4-stars. Do you have any other Shaw on your shelves? I’m currently reading Gene Wolfe’s short story collection in Starwater Strains.

    1. I just read your review — nice! (Again, you should start a sci-fi blog).

      Yes, I recently picked up one of his novels — One Million Tomorrows. I want to procure a copy of Orbitsville as well…. Other Days, Other Eyes is suposed to be his masterpiece.

    1. Yup, I put that cover on my favorites of Vincent di Fate blog post a few weeks back….

      https://sciencefictionruminations.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/adventures-in-science-fiction-cover-art-a-selection-of-vincent-di-fates-early-70s-covers/

      The novel, well, slightly painful but admirable at the same time. The melodrama is annoying, but, somewhat realistic! (strangely). I guess it falls into the “could have been really good but ends up frustrating because of its inadequacies” pile….

Comment! Join the discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s