(Ed Emshwiller’s cover for the 1952 edition)
After Jack Vance’s recent passing I decided that as an informal remembrance I’d review one of his novels. However Big Planet (1952), the only unread novel of his I had on my shelf, is from early in his career and far from the level of his best works. Of his novels I’ve read, Wyst: Alastor, 1716 (1978) and the loose sequel to Big Planet, Showboard World (1975) were the most satisfying. The Blue World (1966), Marune: Alastor, 933 (1975), and City of the Chasch (1968) were all enjoyable adventure tales set in fantastic worlds. I recommend those — along with his more famous novels — before picking up a copy of Big Planet.
Over the course of its publication history Big Planet was cut and modified multiple times from its original magazine form. A restored text was published in 1978… Unfortunately, I read the 1957 Ace edition (with the fun Ed Emshwiller cover — below) which appears to be shorter than the original magazine version. If any of my readers know more on the different versions and what was excised/added I’d love to know.
Brief Plot Summary/Analysis
The lushly realized eponymous Big Planet is a vast decentralized world comprised of various groups from Earth who sought to escape the centralizing tendencies and urbanization of the home planet (Gypsies, political dissidents, religious cultists, nomadic tribesmen, etc). As a result of a critical lack of many natural resources (metal, oil, etc) common on Earth, the inhabitants of Big Planet are technologically primitive. Earth’s government, in an effort to keep the planet from posing any threat, maintains an embargo of metal and other items.
This basic premise, the lack of natural resources and the vast size of the landmasses, informs the rest of Vance’s world building. How do the Big Planet cultures develop basic technologies without metal and plastic? How do the societies communicate over great distances? And travel? How isolated would the people be? What would they know of Earth if they rarely come in contact with people from their old home? As our heroes traverse the surface meeting various cultures, Vance explores how each society has adapted to these factors.
The narrative concerns Claude Glystra, an investigator sent from Earth, who seeks to understand why the Bajarnum of Beaujolais has managed to gain so much power on Big Planet. His other concerns include investigating Big Planet’s slave trade and halting the importation of metal and other weapons. However, before he can land his space craft the vessel is sabotaged and Glystra crashes 40,000 miles away from the only safe haven on the planet, Earth Enclave. Glystra and his team, some of whom may or may not be traitorous (and in the employ of the Bajarnum of Beaujolais), must use their limited resources to traverse the great expanse.
On the way they encounter fantastically bizarre governments, giant toad creatures (well, perhaps), unusual means of transportation, and as all novels of the time did, a ravishing young love interest. By far the most intriguing portion of the novel concerns the city pseudo-Utopian city of Kirstendale, the secret of which I will not give away for it is downright delightful. Cities like Kirstendale form the core of many of his later novels.
Big Planet does manage to set itself apart from the vast quantity of other pulp adventures set on alien planets by including many intriguing religious, societal, political, ethnographical, and biological details — despite the short length (a mere 158 pages) — about the world. Vance would refine this skill — often via an index or even short footnotes — in later novels.
Recommended for fans of 50s planetary romance/pulp science fiction/Ace doubles and Vance completists.
(Vincent Di Fate’s cover for the 1978 edition)
(Ed Emswiller’s cover for the 1959 edition)
(Jim Burns’ cover for the 1977 edition)
(Karel Thole’s cover for the 1975 edition)
(Steve Hickman’s cover for the 1978 edition)
(Jim Burns’ cover for the 2002 edition)
(David Hardy’s cover for the 1989 edition)
(Oliviero Berni’s cover for the 1985 edition)
(Carolo Jacobo’s cover for the 1958 edition)
(Franco Bambilla’s cover for the 2008 edition)
(Karel Thole’s cover for the 1984 edition)
For more book reviews consult the INDEX
14 thoughts on “Book Review: Big Planet, Jack Vance (magazine publication 1952)”
Sounds a bit like a proto-Planet of Adventure to me. I’ll have to see if I can find a copy.
Most definitely! Worth finding if you’re interested in his earlier works.
Heh, I’m interested in all his works. =)
Well, there you go! Thanks for the comments 🙂
I agree with your assessment; Big Planet is good, but below average for Vance.
Yeah, I had a lot of fun reading it but it was rather low on substance and sustained excitement — both things later works improved on.
I had a blast reading Big Planet. Though I had no idea there were so many different versions of it. I feel like I need to track a few others down, I’m not sure which one I read.
Some fantastic covers for it as well. Great post, man! I always have a good time on your blog. 🙂
Well, I’d be tempted to track down the original edition — as in, the restored 1978 reprint. I suspect some of the trademark Vance details were cut from the Ace version. I also would gander that ALL editions published post 1978 are the restored version — especially since the book was published in the Gollancz Masterworks series. So, perhaps you’ve already read the longer version?
To answer your request: you can find on Cosmopolis 25 a very detailed article of Patrick DUSOULIER (French translator of Vance and V.I.E. contributor) concerning the differences between the censored version of Ace and the versions VIE (2002) or Underwood Miller 1978.
title : BigPlanet, Big Cissors.
Thank you! That is a fascinating side-by-side comparison…. reminds me, in a humorous way, to sections of my dissertation which compared how Latin hagiographical texts were rewritten.
The ultimate Vance-approved text is the e-book available at
I’ve only read Big Planet once, and I read the 1989 Tor. Maybe someday I’ll get some money together and get the Vance Integral Edition texts.
(still won’t ever get an ebook reader — hehe)
Urgh. I just finished reading this the other day via the 1977 coronet edition. Started skipping through it because of its tedious storytelling and lack of character development/engagement. But, I did pick it to read because I just wanted something easy and straightforward to read. So there you go.
It’s interesting there were edits. Considering how good his novellas can be, this could easily have been better with even less pages!
I remember very little about the book….. despite rereading my review. Perhaps that tells me how “good” it ultimately was! I remember it being a slightly but somewhat engaging adventure. He definitely wrote better adventure works later in his career.