As always which books/covers/authors intrigue you? Which have you read? Disliked? Enjoyed?
1. Blakely’s Ark, Ian MacMillan (1981)
From the back cover: THE CEPH… A parasitic virus. Invariably lethal. In two generations, it had reduced the population of America to 10 million people.
New Jersey is populated by roving gangs of children, savage and insane. New York City is a sealed-off Dome.
America is a wasteland. And Dave Blakely just may be the last whole man in the world.”
Initial Thoughts: I’ve been in a post-apocalyptic mood for the last year or more. I’ve started (and much to my surprise, enjoyed) my watch through of Survivors (1975-1977). And devoured Leigh Brackett’s The Long Tomorrow (1955).
This is Ian MacMillan’s only SF novel. And SF Encyclopedia describes rather than appraises it… As I often say, “we shall see!” Even if I dislike it, the process of charting out the post-apocalyptic landscape of this period fascinates.
2. Albion! Albion!, Dick Morland (aka Reginald Hall) (1974)
From the back cover: “England in the 1990s: an England in which the partisan and hysterical hooliganism of football supporters has got completely out of control. Parliament has been dissolved, and the country has been divided into four clubs—City, United, Wanderers, and Athletic—all violently opposed to one another.
It is into this savage world that Whitey Singleton, an expatriate journalist engaged in America in counter-revolutionary propaganda against the regime of the Club Managers, is pitched when he plane is hijacked and diverted to London. Singleton is sucked into a nightmare of sinister intrigue which culminates in a rally at Webley Stadium that turns into a riot of explosive frenzy. Originally published in 1974, this prophetic novel anticipated the Brussels riot as well as the Bradford disaster.
Albion! Albion! is a powerful SF parable about modern society which is frightening relevant and utterly gripping.”
Initial Thoughts: If you’ve followed this site for the last two or so years, you’ll know that I enjoy sports-themed science fiction–and not due to any special love of sports. Rather, “I’m a proponent of sports as a SF vehicle for social commentary on commercialism, trauma, alienation, and violence.” Dick Morland’s novel suggests that a fascist state will emerge from the supporters clubs of the biggest football teams. The game itself, if it was ever a “game”, is no longer played. Rather, the structural apparatus of the club remains along with their traditions and heroic histories. It’s a fascinating premise but I’m not entirely convinced by the delivery so far (50 pages to go).
I recently created an INDEX of SF on Sports and Games.
And I highly recommend William Harrison’s “Roller Ball Murder” (1973), Gary K. Wolf’s Killerbowl (1975), and George Alec Effinger’s “25 Crunch Split Right on Two” (1975)
3. Five-Twelfths of Heaven, Melissa Scott (1985)
From the back cover: “THE MAGI HAD MASTERED THE NEW PHYSICS
and harnessed the newly discovered power of the elemental harmonies–Alchemy. In so doing, they changed the face of technology for all time. But it was pilots like Silence Leigh who conquered the starlanes. Silence herself dreamed of a ship–a ship of her own and a destiny removed from the Hegemony’s oppression. But not until she joined the crew of the Sun-Treader did the dream take on reality…. and a destiny never imagined become Silence’s own as well.”
Initial Thoughts: Tarbandu over at The PorPor Books Blog reviewed and raved about Melissa Scott’s Silence Leigh sequence. He rarely gives out 5/5s! So I tracked down the first in the sequence….
4. This World is Taboo, Murray Leinster (1961)
From the back cover: “Land on Dara? One might as well commit suicide!
Untouchable, like the Darans—that’s what they’d call Calhoun if he broke the quarantine. And they’d wipe him out on sight.
But Dara needed him and that was the kind of challenge this Interstellar Med Serviceman would never dodge.”
Initial Thoughts: A few weeks ago I reviewed Murray Leinster’s Doctor to the Stars (1964) and thought I’d purchase the rest in the series.
For book reviews consult the INDEX
For cover art posts consult the INDEX
I gave ‘Albion ! Albion !’ a three star rating; it will be interesting to see what your take on it is………….
https://theporporbooksblog.blogspot.com/search/label/Albion%20%21%20Albion%20%21
I’m probably going to give it a similar rating. I didn’t know you reviewed it… I’ll take a peek.
Hi
The Morland looks interesting. I have read some Leinster, some good, some perhaps rushed I would say. Most of Leinster’s work is fairly old school.
Guy
Hello Guy,
I don’t know if you saw, but I reviewed Leinster’s Doctor to the Stars. https://sciencefictionruminations.com/2020/07/18/book-review-doctor-to-the-stars-murray-leinster-1964/
I’m all for SF that’s anti-business, pro-service, and views the state as having the vital role of guaranteeing the rights of its oppressed citizens — we had a good discussion about his Wilsonian perspective in the review comments. But yes, some of it does feel “old school” — but that’s okay!
I read the Scott and liked the weird magic-tech she creates, but never read the rest of the books. It was a fun book.
I look forward to reading it. I recently snagged Scott’s first novel The Game Beyond (1984). Does she have clear thematic/sociological arguments? I must confess, that interests me the most.
https://sciencefictionruminations.com/2020/03/13/updates-recent-science-fiction-acquisitions-no-ccxl-melissa-scott-ignacio-de-loyola-brandao-sheila-macleod-and-albert-j-guerard/
Five-Twelfths is all I’ve read by her. If you follow Quartzen/Sandstone on Twitter she might be able to tell you more. I know it was her write-up that made me curious. (It might be on her patreon.)
Yup, I follow her. I could just read them and find out… haha
I’ve read the Silence Leigh trilogy, but I read the original paperbacks, not the rewritten version now available on ebook. I enjoyed the books.
Why did she rewrite them? Eh, I’ll review the first published versions. I understand rewriting when it was destroyed by an editor, but…. sometimes the editors are right!
I think the rewritten versions are generally considered better. I suspect the original ones were rushed, and Scott later decided she could do a better job.
I guess I’m not looking for what’s objectively better. I want to read the originals as they were published in the time they were published (the historian in me). It’s an entirely different thing to, post-success, revisit earlier works and “fix” them retrospectively…. As I’m less interested in contemporary SF, the same thing goes for contemporary rewrites. So no, I do not plan on tracking down the new versions.
The same thing goes with Michael Bishop’s claim that his rewritten version of A Funeral For the Eyes of Fire is the one we should read. I loved the original version. I’ll be the one to judge. I’m not going to blindly follow the retrospective views of authors — haha.
And as someone who wrote an entire dissertation on an author who constantly updated his earlier works (navigating the publication history was infuriating at times), I find it fascinating what is added/subtracted/updated and why. For example, I read the latter version of Wilson Tucker’s fantastic The Long Loud Silence (1952, rev. 1969), in which he inserted Vietnam War references (instead of Korean War references?) and re-added the cannibalism scenes cut by the editors.
https://sciencefictionruminations.com/2016/08/17/book-review-the-long-loud-silence-wilson-tucker-1952/
I suspect the desire to revise and be critical about one’s early work is natural so I get why authors feel the need to revisit their earliest works.
Authors don’t always get final cut, and sometimes want to re-issue books that are closer to their submitted version than what was eventually published.
I understand. I also know that sometimes editors are right (as someone whose first academic article was cut and mangled and refashioned by editors — and for good reason — hah).
I do have a decision to make when the revision happens within my area of study. I’m thinking about acquiring a copy of Algis Budrys’ Some Will Not Die.
The 1961 edition radically revised/changed his first novel False Night (1954). But, the 1978 edition was updated even further. So… I’m not sure what I want. A 50s, 60s, or 70s take on the post-apocalypse. Maybe I’ll read the 70s version and compare it to the 50s version.
Who is the European novelist who keeps on putting out tweaked editions of his novels? I thought it was Milan Kundera, but perhaps not.
re: ALBION! ALBION! “Originally published in 1974, this prophetic novel anticipated the Brussels riot as well as the Bradford disaster.”
The apocalypse has arrived! Gangs of those hated and feared British soccer fans run wild across over society’s ruins!
On one level, hilarious.
On another level, not so much. There were reasons to hate and fear them. Back in the day in London, I went to school with one kid in London who used to boast about how he had razors embedded in the steel cps of his Doc Martens and took a brick to soccer games to throw up in the air amid the roar and distraction when the other side scored a goal. Why, yes, he was a sociopath, since you ask.
Obviously, this Morland book won’t come anywhere near Anthony Burgess’s A CLOCKWORK ORANGE, which was an earlier effort inspired by such types. Those genteel Brits!
Hello Mark, I can’t tell from the comment whether you have read Albion! Albion! or are only referencing the back cover blurb.
But yes, I am enjoying the novel so far — I have about 50s pages to go. The ideas are more interesting than the delivery. I like the incorporation of primary sources at the beginning of each chapter (humorously part of a Richard Nixon Guest Series of Historical Lectures). I’d like to think that I know enough about English Football to get some of the jokes. For example, one of the violent first riots at a game (and a traumatic event in the life of the main character) occurred at a third round FA clash. The fact that fans of those small (er) clubs would be go to such lengths….
I haven’t read any of those, but Blakely’s and 5/12 of heaven sounds intriguing.
Thanks for sharing.
But I thought you didn’t read SF from this period!
Thanks for visiting.
No, I don’t, if they’re set in the early 1900s, not if they were written in that time. Give me a book set in the medieval written at any time and I’ll read it. The same goes for SF – I’m a fan of anything fantasy and it’s subgenres. One of my latest SF and a favorite is Brandon Sanderson Skyward series.
Ah, I get it now.
Definitely browse my recent reviews, I’ve read some good stuff!